Wan Burhanuddin bin Wan Abidin's

Dip Arch (ITM), BFA, B.Arch (RISD), S. M. Arch. S (MIT)

Case of The Broken ConDome


| Broken ConDome | Background | Condition | New Home | Migration |

| Studio 200 Domes | Page One |


...to be demolished and disposed by HBP

All good things must come to an end, and so is the life of ConDome in USM. According to the Dean of HBP, Prof Ir. Dr. Mahyuddin Ramli, in a letter dated 12 Feb 2008,

"It is not safe; the components have been corroded by weather, the rusty components may cause the dome to collapse, and would endanger the lives of the public especially HBP students." 

Can the rusty components cause ConDome to collapse? You're  welcome to look at the condition of ConDome, and we shall not harp on that. We take it that HBP just wants to get rid of it, that all.

I therefore wrote an email which said:
  1. I agree that it be disposed from HBP.
  2. I disgree that the demolition be given to a contractor [basically when the student heard from the lab technician that it's being sold for 50cents].
  3. With permission from the school therefore, I'd like to dispose it myself.
The Dean agreed and wanted the job to be done ASAP.
Of course we can ask, why does the Dean associate ConDome to an individual lecturer (CikWan) and not to the Architecture Committee, after all ConDome was a product of 15th National Architecture Workshop hosted by in USM in 2002? Six schools of architecture prepared the components in their own campuses, took them all they way to USM, and built it together in HBP. Technically the dome still belong to all the participating schools of architecture in Malaysia then, and the Architecture Program of HBP is merely entrusted with it.
But we will almost hear something like, "it's CikWan's babylah!"
Sure it's CikWan's baby. In 2003 when the Vice Chancellor of USM wanted HBP to transform and transfer ConDome to Taiping, to represent World Peace, CikWan was reluctantly called in. And the Proposed Geodesic Peace Dome, 2003 was prepared. Despite this initial effort, HBP did not deliver what it had proposed to do.
Why HBP did not meet VC's request, that I really don't know. But I suspect one thing. I still remember how perplexed I was when the Dean wanted a "section drawing" of ConDome so that Dr Norizal can calculate the sizes of the struts (...huh?). I also found out that the Dean tried to get students to draw up ConDome (like they do in measured drawing class). The Dean also tried to get students to do an animation of ConDome (sic). Perhaps it is this difficulty in trying to understand the geodesic dome that we see the Dean's description of ConDome as  "model of a dome," instead of just a dome.
How not to be haunted by the difficulty to come to terms with a geodesic dome? That may perhaps the reason for the destruction (rather than restoration, reconstruction) of all traces of ConDome.
If you'e interested in participating (even if it's just by playing the fiddle while the transformation is happening) to provide ConDome its new lease of life, just email me .

Feedback


"A tonne of scrap metal cannot just cost 50cents, can it?" Anon.


"Crane the dome down in the sea and turn it into a giant man-made coral. Environmentalists build to recycle, builders build to destroy."  Ms S.Hussein, HBP Class of 2004, 26Mar2008, 00:08:40.


| Broken ConDome | Background | Condition | New Home | Migration |

| Studio 200 Domes | Page One |


Intellectual Explorations of Wan Burhanuddin, 1995-2008 USM